华硕ROG Zephyrus M16笔记本电脑评测。一个全面的游戏包当风神玩游戏的时候。 凭借Core i9-12900H、RTX 3070 Ti和DDR5内存，Zephyrus M16包含一些强大的硬件。我们的广泛测试表明，在Alder Lake和RTX 30xx一代的末期，这款游戏笔记本电脑是否仍然能够给人留下深刻印象。Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/18/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇸🇪 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 🇷🇺 Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
M16(2022)GU603zw继承了其同名的前辈，用一个强大的i9 Alder Lake CPU和RTX 3070 Ti，升级了包装。 RTX 3070 Ti.所有这些都是在一个相当苗条和紧凑的16英寸外形尺寸，16:10显示屏（2,560 x 1,500像素），只是勉强错过了我们的最佳移动游戏笔记本电脑名单，因为它的重量只有75克（约2.6盎司）太多（>2公斤=4.4磅）。这本来是列表中的第一个16英寸设备。
由于采用16:10显示屏的16英寸游戏笔记本电脑仍然是少数，我们在比较中也包括具有类似硬件的 "传统 "16:9设备。除了前辈外，这些设备特别是申克视界16 Pro和联想Legion 5 Pro，但也有 申克XMG Focus 16和 Corsair Voyager a1600.
Test device courtesy of Asus
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z (ROG Zephyrus M16 Series)ProcessorIntel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-HGraphics adapterNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 120 W TDP ( including 20 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 528.24, MUX Switch + OptimusMemory32 GB , 1x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-4800 plus 1x 16 GB solderedDisplay16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 165 HzMainboardIntel Alder Lake-P PCHStorageMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, 1024 GB , 960 GB freeSoundcardIntel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)Connections3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: headset port, Card Reader: MicroSDNetworkingRealtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 355 x 243Battery90 Wh Lithium-Ion, 90WHrs, 4S1P, 4-cell Li-ionOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: 720P HD IR camera for Windows HelloPrimary Camera: 1 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 2x 2W stereo speakers, Keyboard: Backlit chiclet keyboard with single-zone RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months WarrantyWeight2.075 kg, Power Supply: 761 g
Price3000 EuroLinksAsus homepageAsus notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
潜在的竞争对手比较
RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionPrice
87.8 %v7 (old)02 / 2023Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Zi9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.6 %v7 (old)06 / 2021Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Hi9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU2 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.8 %v7 (old)11 / 2022SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Tii7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU1.7 kg17.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.7 %v7 (old)10 / 2022Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiR7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU2.6 kg26.6 mm16.00"2560x1600
87 %v7 (old)01 / 2023SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU2.2 kg24.3 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.6 %v7 (old)12 / 2022Corsair Voyager a1600R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M2.4 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
案例--超薄16英寸游戏笔记本由于该案几乎没有任何变化，我们向您介绍一下 我们在2021年对M16的测试的测试，该测试对外壳、维护选项和输入设备进行了详细描述。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Corsair Voyager a1600 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti DIN A4 ❌
连接设备 - HDMI 2.1和Thunderbolt 4
左边：AC、HDMI 2.1 TMDS、GigabitLAN、USB-A 3.2 Gen2、USB-C/Thunderbolt 4（包括DP和PD）、USB-C 3.2 Gen2（包括DP和PD）、耳机接口
右边。USB-A 3.2 Gen2, microSD读卡器, Kensington锁
SD卡阅读器SC读卡器仅限于microSD卡，但至少我们的AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60可以紧紧地贴在一起，而不会伸出来。与已经表现良好的前代产品相比，速度又有了小幅提升。
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
138.1 (127.28min - 140.64max) MB/s Average of class Gaming (20 - 210, n=70, last 2 years)
111.8 MB/s -19%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
96 MB/s -30%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.86 MB/s -39%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)
78.2 MB/s -43%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
77 (59.03min - 141.54max) MB/s -44%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
261.31 MB/s Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
187 MB/s -28%Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=69, last 2 years)
142.7 MB/s -45%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
89.78 MB/s -66%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
86.79 MB/s -67%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)
82.5 MB/s -68%
沟通华硕使用英特尔AX211模块，它也支持6-Ghz网络。与前代的联发科模块相比，传输速率明显增加。性能非常稳定。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzCorsair Voyager a1600Qualcomm WCN685x
1875 (859min - 1931max) MBit/s +17%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1596 (1559min - 1632max) MBit/s SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1569 (594min - 1673max) MBit/s -2%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiMediaTek RZ616
1483 (1373min - 1637max) MBit/s -7%Average of class Gaming (648 - 2355, n=52, last 2 years)
1386 MBit/s -13%Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=220)
1366 MBit/s -14% iperf3 transmit AXE11000Corsair Voyager a1600Qualcomm WCN685x
1780 (896min - 1840max) MBit/s +32%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1576 (1508min, 1508P1 - 1653max) MBit/s +17%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1347 (1002min - 1458max) MBit/s Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=265)
1233 MBit/s -8%Average of class Gaming (469 - 1862, n=118, last 2 years)
1219 MBit/s -10% iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1550min - 1681max) MBit/s SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1637 (829min - 1653max) MBit/s -1%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiMediaTek RZ616
1576 (1546min - 1644max) MBit/s -5%Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=220)
1494 MBit/s -10%Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=52, last 2 years)
1476 MBit/s -11%Corsair Voyager a1600Qualcomm WCN685x
886 (444min - 941max) MBit/s -46% iperf3 receive AXE11000SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1694 (1645min, 1645.58P1 - 1715max) MBit/s +5%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1619 (1564min - 1655max) MBit/s Average of class Gaming (680 - 1741, n=118, last 2 years)
1408 MBit/s -13%Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=265)
1391 MBit/s -14%Corsair Voyager a1600Qualcomm WCN685x
852 (425min - 931max) MBit/s -47%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1373-1637) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1575 (1546-1644) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (470-602) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø697 (360-761)
网络摄像头
16.8 ∆E15.4 ∆E22.3 ∆E20.1 ∆E22.9 ∆E17.5 ∆E16 ∆E29.4 ∆E18.4 ∆E21.1 ∆E16.2 ∆E15.7 ∆E29.5 ∆E19.7 ∆E22.2 ∆E13.5 ∆E23.7 ∆E27.3 ∆E3.3 ∆E12.1 ∆E22.6 ∆E23.9 ∆E24.3 ∆E13.2 ∆EColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z: 19.46 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 29.53 ∆E
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
显示屏 - 16英寸，QHD+，165赫兹尽管它与前代产品的基本规格相同（16英寸，IPS，16:10，2,560 x 1,600，165 Hz），但华硕现在使用了不同的面板。这次没有使用来自友达光电的面板，而是来自京东方。虽然面板甚至略微更亮（481尼特），但亮度分布更不均匀，尤其是左下角的亮度大大降低。由于黑值的明显改善，对比度值有了积极的增加。
响应时间相对较快，尽管前代产品在这里的响应速度更快。PWM不用于亮度控制，一些轻微的屏幕渗漏只在黑暗场景中明显。
哑光覆盖造成的子像素的颗粒感
最小的屏幕出血量
498cd/m²534cd/m²527cd/m²464cd/m²497cd/m²483cd/m²436cd/m²449cd/m²441cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessBOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 534 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 481 cd/m² Minimum: 28.4 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 82 %Center on Battery: 484 cd/m²Contrast: 2367:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.53 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}calibrated: 3.53ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.74 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)98.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D)92.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.2CCT: 6418 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZBOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HAU Optronics AUOC199, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiN160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiBOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)BOE NE16oQDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Corsair Voyager a1600BOE0A3B, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Display-15%-15%-14%-14% Display P3 Coverage (%)92.868.7 -26%67.3 -27%68.3 -26%68.7 -26% sRGB Coverage (%)98.596.7 -2%96.1 -2%96.6 -2%98.2 0% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)83.170 -16%69.5 -16%70.6 -15%70.1 -16%Response Times39%-37%-51%-62%-36% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)4.8 ?(2, 2.8) 37%14.3 ?(6.8, 7.5) -88%14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) -89%16.4 ?(7.4, 9) -116%13 ?(7, 6) -71% Response Time Black / White * (ms)10 ?(4.6, 5.4)6 ?(2, 4) 40%8.6 ?(3.9, 4.7) 14%11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -12%10.8 ?(5, 5.8) -8%10 ?(5, 5) -0% PWM Frequency (Hz)Screen-28%-34%-11%-40%-21%Brightness middle (cd/m²)497448 -10%364 -27%522.8 5%460 -7%355 -29%Brightness (cd/m²)481446 -7%347 -28%503 5%442 -8%340 -29%Brightness Distribution (%)8286 5%89 9%84 2%89 9%91 11%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.210.48 -129%0.3 -43%0.41 -95%0.32 -52%0.53 -152%Contrast (:1)2367933 -61%1213 -49%1275 -46%1438 -39%670 -72%Colorchecker dE 2000 *3.532.76 22%3.3 7%2.47 30%3.65 -3%2.43 31%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *6.157.09 -15%6.6 -7%6.56 -7%7.49 -22%4.31 30%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *3.532.86 19%2.5 29%0.61 83%3.65 -3%1.14 68%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.743.1 -78%5.2 -199%3 -72%5.87 -237%2.62 -51%Gamma2.2 100%2.153 102%2.14 103%2.27 97%2.42 91%2.28 96%CCT6418 101%6826 95%6331 103%6719 97%6711 97%6909 94%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%)87Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%)100Total Average (Program / Settings)6% /
-16%-29% /
-30%-26% /
-17%-39% /
-38%-24% /
-22%* ... smaller is better
华硕宣传100%覆盖DCI-P3色彩空间，但我们测得 "只有 "92.8%。AdobeRGB色彩空间的覆盖率仍为83%。至少在我们选定的竞争对手的测试领域中，这仍然导致了顶级的位置。总的来说，这款显示器也适合于图片和视频的专业编辑。
sRGB
显示 P3
AdobeRGB在交付状态下，面板已经被很好地校准了。只有1.74，灰度的DeltaE值特别低。在ColorChecker中，我们的Portrait Display Calman色彩校准工具测得的偏差略高。额外的校准并没有进一步改善这些数值，而是把已经非常好的灰度弄得一团糟。
灰度
饱和度
颜色检测器
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise↘ 5.4 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise↘ 4.2 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8260 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
尽管显示屏的亮度很好，但你仍应避免在户外被阳光直射，并确保你从正面直视屏幕，因为否则能见度会迅速下降。
即使从极端的视角看，也能轻松阅读显示内容。当从侧面看屏幕时，亮度比从顶部或底部观察角度看时要低。
性能 - 120瓦的RTX 3070-Ti略低于平均水平ROG Zephyrus有各种设备配置。据称，M16也将很快配备英特尔第13代CPU和RTX 40xx，而我们的测试设备仍然使用了一个酷睿i9-12900H和RTX 3070 Ti.
另外，几乎任何东西都有可能从RTX 3050 Ti到 RTX 3080 Ti.在处理器方面，你目前有以下选择 i7-12700H和我们的顶级型号。该设备由32GB内存完成，但这里也有许多选择。
测试条件华硕Armoury Crate软件允许你调整笔记本电脑的各种设置，所以用户应该熟悉这个。它提供了寻找设备更新的选项，选择多彩和动态的Aura壁纸，或控制性能。
制造商提供了三种性能模式（安静、性能和涡轮），还提供了使用Windows性能模式控制性能的选项，甚至可以在手动模式下自己设置几个功率限制--这些选项是许多其他制造商所缺乏的。
3种性能模式加Windows模式加手动模式
手动调整CPU
手动调整GPU由于在Turbo模式下，笔记本电脑在空闲运行时已经非常响亮，我们在 "性能 "模式下运行所有基准测试。安静 "模式只用于电池测试--没有单独的省电模式。
尽管软件本身组织得很好，但各种翻译错误或不完整的句子（在德语版本中）仍然妨碍了一个良好的整体印象。
光环墙纸
动态墙纸。这里左边比较亮，后来，右边的蓝色比较亮
翻译错误：不完整的句子（在德语版本中）
另一个不完整的（德语）句子处理器性能模式。84 W
涡轮模式。99 W
电池操作。40 W华硕已经宣布M16采用英特尔Gen13。在这之前，我们目前仍在使用Intel Core i9-12900H在我们的测试单元中。该高端CPU提供6个性能核心和8个效率核心。性能核心的时钟速度高达5GHz，而效率核心的基本时钟速度为1.8GHz。由于只有P核心支持超线程，我们总共得到12个线程。
在Cinebench循环中，恒定性能非常稳定，在性能模式下最大TDP达到约84瓦。的性能i7-12700H在非常强大的XMG Focus 16在开始的时候甚至略胜一筹。但在最新的第4次运行后，它的性能下降到我们的M16以下，它也击败了Ryzen 7 6800在Legion 5.
顺便说一下，而不是84瓦，在Turbo模式下有强大的99瓦!在电池运行期间，这只有大约40瓦，性能也相应下降。
在所有的测试中，2022年的M16比前代的i9-11900H快20%左右。i9-11900H.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2351 (2324.37-2366.02) SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2440 (2338.36-2692.88)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
84.2 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
68 pt SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
65.4 pt Average Intel Core i9-12900H
64 pt SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
59.5 pt Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
59.1 pt Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
55.9 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H -2! Intel Core i9-11900H
54.1 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=142, last 2 years)
24993 Points +57%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
17378 Points +10%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
15870 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7359 - 19648, n=28)
15133 Points -5%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
14660 (14400.8min - 14660.4max) Points -8%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
13445 Points -15%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
12979 Points -18%Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=142, last 2 years)
1975 Points +6%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
1871 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1634 - 1930, n=28)
1829 Points -2%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
1802 Points -4%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
1775 Points -5%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
1554 Points -17%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1543 Points -18%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=141, last 2 years)
9612 Points +59%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
6358 Points +5%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
6053 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2681 - 7471, n=28)
5717 Points -6%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
5661 Points -6%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
5160 Points -15%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
5152 Points -15%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
4994 Points -17%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=141, last 2 years)
760 Points +6%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
715 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H (624 - 738, n=28)
706 Points -1%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
699 Points -2%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
689 Points -4%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
603 Points -16%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
599 Points -16%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
596 Points -17%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=141, last 2 years)
3865 Points +49%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
2756 (2001.6min - 2029.74max) Points +7%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
2030 (2001.6min - 2029.74max) Points -22%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
2693 (2338.36min - 2692.88max) Points +4%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
2586 (2431.02min - 2585.82max) Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1395 - 3077, n=28)
2454 Points -5%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
2366 (2324.37min - 2366.02max) Points -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
2211 (1875.21min - 2210.56max) Points -15%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
2161 Points -16%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=140, last 2 years)
292 Points +11%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
263 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H (235 - 277, n=29)
262 Points 0%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
261 Points -1%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points -3%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
248 Points -6%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
245 Points -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
236 Points -10%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
261 Seconds * -34%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
243 Seconds * -25%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 451, n=28)
231 Seconds * -18%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
227 Seconds * -16%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
213 Seconds * -9%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
211 Seconds * -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
195 Seconds * Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=137, last 2 years)
155 Seconds * +21%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=139, last 2 years)
91407 MIPS +38%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
66057 MIPS Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
64817 MIPS -2%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
64403 MIPS -3%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
62024 MIPS -6%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34684 - 76677, n=28)
60849 MIPS -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
54156 MIPS -18%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
51281 MIPS -22%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=139, last 2 years)
6388 MIPS +3%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
6192 MIPS SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
5858 MIPS -5%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=28)
5843 MIPS -6%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
5805 MIPS -6%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
5803 MIPS -6%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
5764 MIPS -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
5582 MIPS -10%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=138, last 2 years)
16713 Points +31%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
12753 Points SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
12058 Points -5%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=31)
11913 Points -7%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
10846 Points -15%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
10355 Points -19%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
10040 Points -21%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
9663 Points -24%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=138, last 2 years)
1998 Points +9%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
1841 Points SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
1821 Points -1%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1631 - 1897, n=31)
1800 Points -2%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
1737 Points -6%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
1624 Points -12%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1566 Points -15%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
1481 Points -20%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=139, last 2 years)
26.9 fps +42%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
18.9 fps Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
18.5 fps -2%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
18 fps -5%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8.05 - 22.5, n=28)
17.1 fps -10%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
16.8 fps -11%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
15 fps -21%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
13.8 fps -27%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
57.2 s * -36%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
52.8 s * -25%Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=138, last 2 years)
47.3 s * -12%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
44.1 s * -5%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
43.3 s * -3%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36.8 - 59.8, n=28)
42.4 s * -0%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
42.2 s * Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
40.5 s * +4%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H
0.544 sec * -25%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
0.4897 sec * -13%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
0.4894 sec * -12%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4685 sec * -8%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
0.4582 sec * -5%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.506, n=28)
0.454 sec * -4%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H
0.4352 sec * Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=140, last 2 years)
0.4287 sec * +1%* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit2586 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit276 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit263 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)6053 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)715 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core1871 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core15870 Points
Help... in comparison
Performance Rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
98 pt Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
76.6 pt Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
74 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
70.1 pt SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
65.2 pt Average Intel Core i9-12900H
57.9 pt SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H -9! Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=138, last 2 years)
27744 KRay/s +80%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
17031 KRay/s +11%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
15798 KRay/s +3%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 KRay/s SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
15068 KRay/s -2%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12459 KRay/s -19%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=28)
11191 KRay/s -27%AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=138, last 2 years)
125826 Points +68%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105987 Points +41%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
99931 Points +33%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
81613 Points +9%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
74919 Points SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62698 Points -16%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=28)
55458 Points -26%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=138, last 2 years)
5789 MB/s +63%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3902 MB/s +10%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3634 MB/s +3%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3545 MB/s Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
3410 MB/s -4%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=28)
3048 MB/s -14%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2895 MB/s -18%AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=138, last 2 years)
119345 Points +13%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106322 Points +1%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105420 Points Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
105203 Points 0%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102320 Points -3%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78172 - 111241, n=28)
100462 Points -5%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
89788 Points -15%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=138, last 2 years)
14309 Points +50%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
13039 Points +37%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12842 Points +35%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9727 Points +2%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9538 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=28)
9016 Points -5%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8476 Points -11%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=138, last 2 years)
64755 Points +77%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58327 Points +60%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
54778 Points +50%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
38369 Points +5%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36496 Points SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31038 Points -15%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=28)
28667 Points -21%AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
137383 MB/s +7%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
135448 MB/s +5%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
128492 MB/s Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=138, last 2 years)
110385 MB/s -14%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=28)
85711 MB/s -33%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
76636 MB/s -40%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61160 MB/s -52%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=138, last 2 years)
1525 MB/s +54%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1116 MB/s +12%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
993 MB/s Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=28)
932 MB/s -6%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
901 MB/s -9%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
866 MB/s -13%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
835 MB/s -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=138, last 2 years)
14844 KRay/s +78%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8856 KRay/s +6%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
8438 KRay/s +1%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8316 KRay/s SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8034 KRay/s -3%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6644 KRay/s -20%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=28)
6205 KRay/s -25%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=138, last 2 years)
43179 MPixel/s +1%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42660 MPixel/s 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42574 MPixel/s Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=29)
36660 MPixel/s -14%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
30182 MPixel/s -29%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
30047 MPixel/s -29%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
29687 MPixel/s -30%
系统性能在PCMark中，i9和RTX 3070 Ti的组合为 RTX 3070 Ti在所有基准测试中都处于领先地位，但这也是预期的性能水平。CrossMark基准测试的情况也是如此。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=121, last 2 years)
8091 Points +3%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7871 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6)
7712 Points -2%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7549 Points -4%Corsair Voyager a1600Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7208 Points -8%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7134 Points -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7097 Points -10%PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10936 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6)
10807 Points -1%Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=123, last 2 years)
10784 Points -1%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10544 Points -4%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10472 Points -4%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10150 Points -7%Corsair Voyager a1600Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9970 Points -9%PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10187 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6)
10153 Points 0%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9929 Points -3%Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=121, last 2 years)
9873 Points -3%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9479 Points -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9113 Points -11%Corsair Voyager a1600Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8983 Points -12%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=121, last 2 years)
13666 Points +15%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11881 Points Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11759 Points -1%Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6)
11364 Points -4%Corsair Voyager a1600Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11350 Points -4%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10097 Points -15%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9777 Points -18%CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=110, last 2 years)
1987 Points +5%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1884 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6)
1871 Points -1%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1657 Points -12%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1648 Points -13%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1643 Points -13%Corsair Voyager a1600Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1415 Points -25%CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=110, last 2 years)
1866 Points +4%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1797 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6)
1784 Points -1%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1600 Points -11%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1592 Points -11%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1582 Points -12%Corsair Voyager a1600Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1379 Points -23%CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=110, last 2 years)
2216 Points +11%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2004 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6)
2004 Points 0%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1829 Points -9%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1816 Points -9%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1746 Points -13%Corsair Voyager a1600Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1599 Points -20%CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1803 Points Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6)
1759 Points -2%Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=110, last 2 years)
1744 Points -3%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1481 Points -18%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1419 Points -21%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1363 Points -24%Corsair Voyager a1600Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1060 Points -41%
PCMark 10 Score
7871 pointsHelp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=138, last 2 years)
71165 MB/s +13%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63157 MB/s SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63102 MB/s 0%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=28)
58945 MB/s -7%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51182 MB/s -19%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
49972 MB/s -21%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44959 MB/s -29%AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=138, last 2 years)
74058 MB/s +10%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67051 MB/s SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66149 MB/s -1%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=28)
61718 MB/s -8%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51778 MB/s -23%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
51270 MB/s -24%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
46043 MB/s -31%AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=138, last 2 years)
72826 MB/s +10%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66275 MB/s SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65336 MB/s -1%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 67858, n=28)
59318 MB/s -10%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55307 MB/s -17%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
55214 MB/s -17%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
48054 MB/s -27%AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=138, last 2 years)
101.5 ns * -15%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
95.2 ns * -8%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
92.5 ns * -5%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91.2 ns * -4%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88 ns * Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87.1 ns * +1%Average Intel Core i9-12900H (74.7 - 118.1, n=27)
85.7 ns * +3%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟不幸的是，LatencyMon在启动软件时已经发现了第一个延迟，即使没有额外的操作。当用多个标签打开浏览器时，延迟会进一步增加。
我们的4K/60-fps YouTube视频也不能在没有任何丢帧的情况下再现(6)。然而，延迟值总体上并不是特别高，而且低于在 XMG Focus 16，比如说。另一方面，它们变得很明显。
YouTube测试
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1994.6 μs * -111%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
960 μs * -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
945.7 μs * Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
776 μs * +18%Corsair Voyager a1600Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
773 μs * +18%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
747.7 μs * +21%* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案我们的测试模型使用美光公司的PCIe Gen4固态硬盘，存储量为1TB。在我们的 最佳固态硬盘列表中，它排在第74位。基准测试证实了该存储解决方案的体面价值。然而，三星存储的测量值在前辈或 Legion 5，则更快。
这款固态硬盘不太能够长期保持其性能，但性能下降的幅度很小。
AS SSD
AS SSD复制
Crystaldiskmark 6
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFHCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6585 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4887 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
724 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
579 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
60.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
247 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
2360 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
2313 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFHSequential Read:
3388MB/s
Sequential Write:
4240MB/s
4K Read:
52.1MB/s
4K Write:
205MB/s
4K-64 Read:
2171MB/s
4K-64 Write:
2324MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.052ms
Access Time Write:
0.02ms
Copy ISO:
2708.61MB/s
Copy Program:
950.94MB/s
Copy Game:
1630.13MB/s
Score Read:
2562Points
Score Write:
2953Points
Score Total:
6864Points
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFHDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
6550MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
4876MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
3764MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
4767MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
2855MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
2694MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
74.3MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
264MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
4741MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
87.6 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
87.4 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
79.5 pt SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
79.2 pt Average of class Gaming
78.3 pt Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
70.5 pt SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
62.1 pt Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
61.8 pt DiskSpd
seq readLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4229 (4208.75min - 4229.47max) MB/s +12%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4101 (4091.33min - 4100.54max) MB/s +9%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3788 (3770.05min - 3788.09max) MB/s +1%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3764 (3540.2min - 3763.76max) MB/s SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3664 (3617.8min - 3664.36max) MB/s -3%Average of class Gaming (281 - 8300, n=122, last 2 years)
3520 MB/s -6%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1306 - 4343, n=23)
3283 MB/s -13%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3207 (3148.45min - 3206.84max) MB/s -15% seq writeAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4767 (4365.51min - 4766.62max) MB/s Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4158 (4130.89min - 4157.81max) MB/s -13%Average of class Gaming (1247 - 9699, n=122, last 2 years)
4041 MB/s -15%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4030 (4011.22min - 4030.01max) MB/s -15%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2416 - 4954, n=23)
3856 MB/s -19%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3481 (3471.23min - 3481.48max) MB/s -27%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3377 (3301.76min - 3376.79max) MB/s -29%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2974 (2933.08min - 2974.1max) MB/s -38% seq q8 t1 readAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7090 (6255.18min - 7089.92max) MB/s +8%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6861 (5902.16min - 6860.74max) MB/s +5%Average of class Gaming (2644 - 15056, n=122, last 2 years)
6860 MB/s +5%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6789 (5989.89min - 6788.74max) MB/s +4%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6593 (6284.75min - 6592.61max) MB/s +1%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (6207 - 6734, n=23)
6571 MB/s 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6550 (5497.59min - 6549.73max) MB/s Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6099 (5570.64min - 6098.73max) MB/s -7% seq q8 t1 writeAverage of class Gaming (1281 - 13519, n=122, last 2 years)
5499 MB/s +13%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5216 (5094.91min - 5216.3max) MB/s +7%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5048 (5040.92min - 5048.44max) MB/s +4%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5033 (5015.97min - 5032.74max) MB/s +3%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4969 (4945.26min - 4969.12max) MB/s +2%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4939 (4914.28min - 4939.19max) MB/s +1%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4876 (4374.87min - 4876.3max) MB/s Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (4259 - 4991, n=23)
4807 MB/s -1% 4k q1 t1 readSCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
81.1 (79.64min - 81.05max) MB/s +9%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
79.8 (79.31min - 79.75max) MB/s +7%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
75 (74.44min - 75.02max) MB/s +1%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
74.3 (71.59min - 74.33max) MB/s Average of class Gaming (32.2 - 110.2, n=122, last 2 years)
69.1 MB/s -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
59.4 (59.37min - 59.41max) MB/s -20%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (39.2 - 74.3, n=23)
59.4 MB/s -20%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
58.6 (57.33min - 58.61max) MB/s -21% 4k q1 t1 writeAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
264 (263.57min - 264.44max) MB/s Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=122, last 2 years)
216 MB/s -18%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
194.2 (193.1min - 194.16max) MB/s -26%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
190 (189.88min - 190.32max) MB/s -28%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (125.8 - 273, n=23)
189.4 MB/s -28%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
156.4 (153.47min - 156.39max) MB/s -41%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
140.8 (138.42min - 140.84max) MB/s -47%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
138 (136.39min - 138max) MB/s -48% 4k q32 t16 readLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4178 (4170.63min - 4178.12max) MB/s +46%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4056 (4048.94min - 4055.97max) MB/s +42%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3340 (3040.22min - 3340.46max) MB/s +17%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2855 (2482.75min - 2854.87max) MB/s Average of class Gaming (417 - 8067, n=122, last 2 years)
2596 MB/s -9%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (636 - 2868, n=23)
2075 MB/s -27%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1404 (1371.85min - 1404.22max) MB/s -51%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
895 (882.72min - 894.69max) MB/s -69% 4k q32 t16 writeLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3559 (3517.38min - 3559.2max) MB/s +32%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3478 (3468.35min - 3478.1max) MB/s +29%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2694 (2561.51min - 2693.92max) MB/s SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2605 (2378.14min - 2604.93max) MB/s -3%Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 5653, n=122, last 2 years)
2137 MB/s -21%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (328 - 2786, n=23)
1765 MB/s -34%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
497 (485.81min - 496.85max) MB/s -82%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
346 (331.29min - 346.04max) MB/s -87%AS SSD
Score TotalLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8923 Points +30%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8563 Points +25%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7293 Points +6%Average of class Gaming (2858 - 13854, n=118, last 2 years)
6948 Points +1%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6864 Points Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (3998 - 7575, n=21)
6303 Points -8%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5878 Points -14%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3394 Points -51% Score ReadLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3433 Points +34%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3208 Points +25%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2894 Points +13%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2562 Points Average of class Gaming (953 - 4721, n=118, last 2 years)
2414 Points -6%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1123 - 2855, n=21)
2259 Points -12%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1824 Points -29%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1525 Points -40% Score WriteLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3809 Points +29%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3790 Points +28%Average of class Gaming (1375 - 7208, n=118, last 2 years)
3370 Points +14%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3221 Points +9%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3019 Points +2%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2953 Points Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2373 - 3304, n=21)
2942 Points 0%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1130 Points -62% Seq ReadAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5615 MB/s +66%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5434.9 MB/s +60%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5347 MB/s +58%Average of class Gaming (2272 - 9890, n=118, last 2 years)
5275 MB/s +56%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4821 MB/s +42%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4764.72 MB/s +41%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2201 - 5348, n=21)
4468 MB/s +32%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3388 MB/s Seq WriteAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4297 MB/s +1%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4240 MB/s SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4136 MB/s -2%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4007.79 MB/s -5%Average of class Gaming (114.5 - 9926, n=118, last 2 years)
3989 MB/s -6%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1876 - 4539, n=21)
3311 MB/s -22%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2725.01 MB/s -36%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2725 MB/s -36% 4K ReadSCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
75.03 MB/s +44%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.79 MB/s +38%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
70.76 MB/s +36%Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 108.4, n=118, last 2 years)
68.3 MB/s +31%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (40.6 - 67.7, n=21)
58.6 MB/s +12%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
55.3 MB/s +6%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
52.1 MB/s Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
49.75 MB/s -5% 4K WriteAverage of class Gaming (75.6 - 512, n=118, last 2 years)
219 MB/s +7%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
205 MB/s Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (97.9 - 242, n=21)
177.9 MB/s -13%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
171.09 MB/s -17%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
170.5 MB/s -17%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
168.84 MB/s -18%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
159.04 MB/s -22%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
141.54 MB/s -31% 4K-64 ReadLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2817.67 MB/s +30%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2591 MB/s +19%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2346.64 MB/s +8%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2171 MB/s Average of class Gaming (517 - 3630, n=118, last 2 years)
1811 MB/s -17%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (603 - 2264, n=21)
1754 MB/s -19%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1292.41 MB/s -40%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
915.1 MB/s -58% 4K-64 WriteLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3239.16 MB/s +39%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3190 MB/s +37%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2807.18 MB/s +21%Average of class Gaming (960 - 5909, n=118, last 2 years)
2755 MB/s +19%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2575.15 MB/s +11%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1959 - 2807, n=21)
2433 MB/s +5%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2324 MB/s SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
556.92 MB/s -76% Access Time ReadCorsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.078 ms * -50%Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=118, last 2 years)
0.05671 ms * -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.052 ms * Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (0.023 - 0.089, n=20)
0.04675 ms * +10%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.04 ms * +23%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.039 ms * +25%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.032 ms * +38%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * +58% Access Time WriteLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.072 ms * -260%Average of class Gaming (0.012 - 0.29, n=118, last 2 years)
0.04116 ms * -106%Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (0.019 - 0.092, n=21)
0.0369 ms * -85%Corsair Voyager a1600Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.029 ms * -45%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HSamsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.025 ms * -25%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.025 ms * -25%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * -10%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.02 ms * * ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø4741 (3891.45-4949.7) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6607 (6029.31-6634.49) SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø4049 (1282.88-6894.75)
图形卡我们的测试系统使用了一个RTX 3070 Ti。尽管它确实是最强大的笔记本电脑GPU之一，但它 "只 "被允许在M16中使用100W和20W动态提升。当允许使用150瓦时， 同样的GPU在M16系统中更快 ，这并不令人惊讶。Legion 5 Pro的速度，甚至高达27%!
至少，前辈的 RTX 3070(没有 "Ti")超过了38%。这款XMG Vision 16 Pro只允许最大95W的GPU，所以也仍然大大落后于M16。
Fire Strike 在电池操作中总的来说，120-W显卡的速度比我们数据库中的平均RTX 3070 Ti慢了约7至12%。
在Turbo模式下，性能和消耗略有增加，另一个Fire-Strike测试的结果是图形得分高出约13%。
在电池运行期间，3D性能明显下降。与主电源运行时Fire Strike 的24,618个图形点相比，在电池运行时只剩下7,348个3D点，这相当于下降了70%!
Fire Strike 在性能模式下
Fire Strike 在涡轮模式下
Time Spy
Cloud Gate
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
95.2 pt Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
88.4 pt Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
82.9 pt Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
73.8 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
69.6 pt SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti -1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
65.6 pt SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
62.8 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
43.2 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (10741 - 76300, n=132, last 2 years)
48167 Points +49%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
40796 Points +27%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
39075 Points +21%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (13799 - 42569, n=36)
35944 Points +12%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
32236 Points SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
32207 Points 0%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
29319 Points -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
20039 Points -38%3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
181005 Points +28%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
170020 Points +20%Average of class Gaming (84648 - 223650, n=59, last 2 years)
146065 Points +3%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
141689 Points Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (33126 - 181005, n=25)
130456 Points -8%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
128056 Points -10%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
78290 Points -45%1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Gaming (2913 - 62849, n=148, last 2 years)
35297 Points +43%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
31289 Points +27%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
30507 Points +24%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22612 - 32550, n=37)
27554 Points +12%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
24618 Points SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
24322 Points -1%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
22035 Points -10%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
16628 Points -32%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Gaming (2295 - 25763, n=143, last 2 years)
14855 Points +58%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
11923 Points +27%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (8142 - 12324, n=37)
10478 Points +11%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
10439 Points +11%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
9421 Points SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9057 Points -4%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
8466 Points -10%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
6059 Points -36%
3DMark 11 Performance
29169 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
59794 points3DMark Fire Strike Score
21717 points3DMark Time Spy Score
9841 pointsHelp... in comparison
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMDAverage NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (n=1)
380 Seconds * Average of class Gaming (63 - 313, n=3, last 2 years)
168.3 Seconds * Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
63 Seconds * v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTXSCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
32 Seconds * -14%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
28 Seconds * SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
27 Seconds * +4%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22 - 30, n=15)
25.3 Seconds * +10%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
22 Seconds * +21%Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=134, last 2 years)
19.1 Seconds * +32% v3.3 Classroom CUDASCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
54 Seconds * -20%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
45 Seconds * -0%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
45 Seconds * Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (36 - 46, n=16)
41.4 Seconds * +8%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
36 Seconds * +20%Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=135, last 2 years)
31.8 Seconds * +29% v3.3 Classroom CPUSCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
459 Seconds * -40%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
441 Seconds * -34%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
382 Seconds * -16%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (285 - 459, n=16)
376 Seconds * -14%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
355 Seconds * -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
329 Seconds * Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=136, last 2 years)
263 Seconds * +20%* ... smaller is better
游戏性能在游戏时，整体上的差异并不是很大，这也是因为在相应的CPU重度游戏中，强大的CPU能够赶上。在GPU重的游戏中，如《Witcher 3 》或《奇异旅》，5Pro的性能是最强的。Legion 5 Pro与其150-W RTX 3070-Ti明显领先。在DOTA 2 Reborn或X-Plane 11.11中，M16能够名列前茅。
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
97.8 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
82.5 pt Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
82 pt SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
77 pt SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
71.3 pt Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
69.6 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
63.5 pt The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 224, n=68, last 2 years)
135.4 fps +36%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
117 (106min) fps +18%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
108 (38min, 58.3P0.1, 88.2P1) fps +9%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.5 fps Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
89.1 (76min) fps -10%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
84.9 (80min, 81P1) fps -15%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80 fps -20%GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=125, last 2 years)
123 fps +14%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
110.1 (6.31min, 76.9P1) fps +2%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
108.1 (4.18min, 76.9P1) fps Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104 (6.17min, 71.4P1) fps -4%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94.7 (8.91min, 62.5P1) fps -12%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
92.8 (6.46min, 55.6P1) fps -14%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
79.4 (10.2min, 47.6P1) fps -27%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=136, last 2 years)
134.7 fps +42%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
115.6 fps +22%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
97.5 fps +3%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.8 fps SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91.4 fps -4%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84.5 fps -11%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
65.7 fps -31%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=125, last 2 years)
260 fps +59%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
217 (41.5min, 154.4P1) fps +32%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
206 (116.9min, 151.5P1) fps +26%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
163.8 (35.9min, 125.2P1) fps SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
162.6 (46.7min, 118.8P1) fps -1%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
150.1 (57.7min, 109.7P1) fps -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
105 (66.4min, 72.1P1) fps -36%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
160.5 (140.4min) fps Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=139, last 2 years)
154.3 fps -4%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
146.7 (125.5min) fps -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
139 (109.6min) fps -13%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
135.7 (118min) fps -15%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
126.6 (111.8min) fps -21%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
114.8 (94.7min) fps -28%X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
115 fps Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 150.2, n=142, last 2 years)
104.4 fps -9%SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
101 fps -12%SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99.5 fps -13%Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86.4 fps -25%Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
83.9 fps -27%Corsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
45.3 fps -61%
这款笔记本电脑不支持高级优化，而是支持普通的优化，它还提供一个MUX开关，允许你在集成（或混合模式）和专用GPU之间主动切换。
我们的Witcher 3 循环导致了相对稳定的帧率。竞争对手之间的性能差异在这里变得很明显：虽然Legion 5 Pro的速度要快得多，而 申克视讯16专业版几乎没有被超越。
在涡轮模式下（蓝图，测量时间为6分钟），性能大大增加，在某些部分接近Legion 5 Pro的性能。然后，笔记本产生的噪音也同样响亮，你也可以在下面的排放物部分看到。GPU和存储速度增加，功耗也增加到近120W。
随着时间的推移，GPU的时钟速度仍然略有下降，最后平均为1,288 MHz。显卡的温度上升到72 °C (162°F) 左右，而显卡 的平均 功耗只有 93 W，这与TGP的目标值还有很大差距。
性能模式下的GPU时钟速度
GPU时钟速度 涡轮
GPU存储速度 性能
GPU存储速度涡轮
GPU温度性能
GPU温度加速
GPU功耗 性能
GPU功耗涡轮The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91 (74-97) SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø84.9 (80-93) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø110.7 (100-116) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø100.7 (96-107)
lowmed.highultraQHD4KGTA V (2015)
184.6
171.4
108.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)
370.2
273.2
171
99.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
195.2
174.7
170.2
160.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
123.8
94.8
72.1
43
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
166.8
145.7
115
Far Cry 5 (2018)
174
128
128
124
90
Strange Brigade (2018)
376
227
187.9
163.8
Dying Light 2 (2022)
98.5
79
66
46.7
排放 - 适度的华硕M16噪声水平在空闲运行期间，风扇经常被关闭--但不是持续的。不时地，它们可以很容易地转速到47分贝，例如在重启后，当Windows启动时。
在 "大选 "期间的噪音水平Witcher 3在3DMark 06基准测试的第一个场景中，风扇基本保持安静，只有34分贝，而在结束前风扇噪音才增加到47分贝。Schenker Vision 16 Pro 和Legion 5 Pro 能够保持更长时间的安静。
在游戏时，与竞争对手相比，M16的操作仍然相当安静，其中一些产品的噪音水平明显高于50分贝，而M16的噪音水平仍然低于这一水平。然而，这只适用于性能模式。如果你使用Turbo模式，风扇转速几乎达到55分贝，这与Legion 5 Pro的水平相同，并明显高于Vision 16 Pro的声音。
Noise Level
Idle
23 / 24 / 47 dB(A)Load
47.91 / 50.25 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFHAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLBSCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BWLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLRSCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BWCorsair Voyager a1600Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLBNoise-8%8%-1%0%-9%off / environment * (dB)2325 -9%22.9 -0%23.5 -2%23 -0%29.9 -30%Idle Minimum * (dB)2325 -9%24.3 -6%23.7 -3%23 -0%30.5 -33%Idle Average * (dB)2431 -29%24.3 -1%31.1 -30%23 4%30.6 -28%Idle Maximum * (dB)4742 11%24.3 48%32.2 31%32.07 32%30.7 35%Load Average * (dB)47.9148 -0%38.5 20%38.4 20%53.7 -12%44.5 7%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)48.9152 -6%51 -4%54.8 -12%54.58 -12%Load Maximum * (dB)50.2556 -11%51 -1%54.8 -9%54.58 -9%51.1 -2%* ... smaller is better
温度在重载的情况下，机箱的顶部和底部会发热到略高于50°C（122°F）。这仍然在通常的范围内，甚至比前代产品略好。的 Legion 5 Pro 在顶部仍然略微凉爽，而 Vision 16 Pro 在底部略微凉一些。
Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
46 °C52 °C48 °C 40 °C49 °C42 °C 30 °C32 °C30 °C
Maximum: 52 °CAverage: 41 °C
49 °C50 °C49 °C43 °C51 °C48 °C27 °C34 °C36 °C
Maximum: 51 °CAverage: 43 °C Power Supply (max.) 51 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 MiniMax. LoadIdleWitcher 3
29 °C29 °C28 °C 28 °C28 °C27 °C 24 °C22 °C23 °C
Maximum: 29 °CAverage: 26.4 °C
33 °C33 °C33 °C31 °C32 °C32 °C22 °C22 °C24 °C
Maximum: 33 °CAverage: 29.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 26 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 MiniMax. LoadIdleWitcher 3
46 °C51 °C48 °C 37 °C49 °C41 °C 29 °C31 °C30 °C
Maximum: 51 °CAverage: 40.2 °C
48 °C49 °C48 °C43 °C52 °C44 °C27 °C33 °C32 °C
Maximum: 52 °CAverage: 41.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 53 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
Witcher 3 期间的热图 - 顶部
Witcher 3 期间的热图--底部
压力测试 - 顶部
压力测试--底部
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZIntel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPUAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HIntel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPUSCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPULenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiAMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPUSCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPUCorsair Voyager a1600AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800MHeat-15%9%3%4%-7%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)5252 -0%50.8 2%43.8 16%50 4%50.7 2%Maximum Bottom * (°C)5153 -4%46.3 9%53 -4%48 6%54.2 -6%Idle Upper Side * (°C)2938 -31%27.2 6%30 -3%28 3%35.8 -23%Idle Bottom * (°C)3341 -24%26.6 19%31.8 4%32 3%33 -0%* ... smaller is better
压力测试CPU核心以3.5GHz的频率开始我们的压力测试。几秒钟后，时钟速度开始下降，在2.4GHz左右趋于平缓。温度有所变化，最高为97℃（207°F）， 平均为83℃（181 °F）。CPU的TDP平均为44W。
显卡速度在500至1600兆赫之间变化很大，平均为838兆赫。存储速度在1.4GHz左右，GPU加热到约70°C（158°F）。我们测量的功耗约为66瓦。
CPU时钟速度
GPU时钟速度
CPU温度
GPU温度
CPU功耗
GPU的耗电量
CPU时钟(GHz)
GPU时钟(MHz)
CPU平均温度(℃)
GPU平均温度(℃)
Prime95 + FurMark压力
2,4
838
83
70
Witcher 3 压力
1.1
1,288
68
72
发言人华硕在M16的扬声器方面采取了特殊的做法：制造商没有使用通常的立体声扬声器，而是使用了四个扬声器，每个2W，两个用于高频，两个用于低频。这一点变得相当明显，扬声器不仅相对响亮，而且还提供平衡的中音和高音，甚至低音也不像许多竞争对手那样表现不足。
然而，它们仍然不能取代半途而废的外部扬声器。对于模拟音频设备的连接，你可以使用一个组合音频端口。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理--游戏时效率高，但空闲时不稳定消耗功率压力测试中的240瓦电源不幸的是，尽管任务管理器没有显示任何阻碍性进程，但空闲时的消耗量变化很大，变得相当高。即使在长时间运行后，情况也是如此。我们欢迎华硕在这方面进行一些驱动更新。
在游戏时，M16的消耗量出奇的低（144W）。Vision 16 Pro 的消耗量多出8%，而更强大的Legion 5 Pro 甚至多出45%!考虑到Legion 5 的额外性能，这并不十分令人惊讶，但差异的程度却令人惊讶，因为即使是明显较弱的前辈 在游戏时也会消耗更多的电力。
如果我们为M16选择Turbo模式，它在游戏 时消耗175瓦（《Witcher 3 》 ）而不是144瓦（蓝图）。这就比Vision 16 Pro略高，但仍低于Legion 5 Pro的209瓦。
我们测量了240W电源的临时负载峰值高达220W，因此这应该足以满足所有的使用场景。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.151 / 3.6 WattIdle 10.8 / 17 / 17.8 Watt
Load
116 / 220 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Zi9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Hi9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Tii7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiR7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Corsair Voyager a1600R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Average of class Gaming Power Consumption-14%14%-30%-16%-32%-23%-24%Idle Minimum * (Watt)10.811 -2%9 17%9.7 10%14.7 -36%16.9 -56%14.2 ?(4 - 34.6, n=27) -31%14.3 ?(4.3 - 41.5, n=119, last 2 years) -32%Idle Average * (Watt)1720 -18%13.3 22%14.8 13%18.6 -9%20.3 -19%19.9 ?(8.9 - 43, n=27) -17%20.4 ?(8 - 55.6, n=119, last 2 years) -20%Idle Maximum * (Watt)17.830 -69%14.3 20%45.8 -157%21.2 -19%22.2 -25%26.2 ?(14.3 - 47.3, n=27) -47%27.4 ?(9 - 101.1, n=119, last 2 years) -54%Load Average * (Watt)116111 4%107 8%87.2 25%121 -4%133.4 -15%125.8 ?(87.2 - 202, n=27) -8%110.4 ?(32.1 - 201, n=117, last 2 years) 5%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)144156 -8%155.2 -8%209 -45%174 -21%206 -43%Load Maximum * (Watt)220197 10%172 22%275.3 -25%235 -7%248 ?(160 - 319, n=27) -13%262 ?(64.5 - 431, n=119, last 2 years) -19%* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø143.7 (127.65-153.76) SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø155.2 (151.5-160.3) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø209 (199.1-224) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø175.5 (172.3-181.1) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø160.5 (98.84-220.16) SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø158.8 (152.1-172.1) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø246 (205-276) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø21.4 (6.343-56.588) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.1 (1.518-17.6)
Power Consumption with External Monitor
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø127.1 (116.71-135.72) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø157.2 (152.3-159.9) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø124.9 (117.36-132.82) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø148.9 (148.1-150.4) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø130.6 (127.18-136.05) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø192.6 (185-198.4) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø134.4 (129.69-138.76) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø210 (203-221) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø26.5 (24.583-33.509) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.8 (2.24-28.2)
电池寿命华硕在性能选项中并没有列出任何真正的省电模式。如果你拔掉插头，M16会自动切换到静音模式。
电池容量为90Wh，相比之下还算不错。Vision 16 Pro和Legion 5只提供80Wh的容量。这导致M16的持续时间相应地更长。
根据显示亮度的不同，运行时间也有很大差异。在我们的WiFi测试中，M16的持续时间在5小时（全亮度）和约7.5小时（150尼特）之间。
在看电影时，你可以期待差不多的时间。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 25min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
5h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 26min
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Zi9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 WhAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Hi9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 WhSCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Tii7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 WhLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 TiR7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 WhSCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 WhCorsair Voyager a1600R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M, 99 WhAverage of class Gaming Battery Runtime9%-14%-41%-18%3%-1%H.264 (h)7.36.1 -16%6 -18%7.77 ?(2.15 - 15, n=40, last 2 years) 6%WiFi v1.3 (h)7.47.7 4%6 -19%4.4 -41%4.8 -35%5.8 -22%6.51 ?(1.417 - 14.8, n=121, last 2 years) -12%Load (h)1.41.6 14%1.3 -7%1.4 0%2.1 50%1.431 ?(0.683 - 2.73, n=65, last 2 years) 2%Reader / Idle (h)13.379.71 ?(3.12 - 21.5, n=33, last 2 years)
Pros+ 明亮的16:10显示屏，165赫兹
+ 非常好的CPU性能
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 游戏时效率高
+ 合适的电池寿命Cons- RTX 3070 Ti略低于平均水平
- 只有一个microSD读卡器
- 风扇控制不太理想
结论 - 一个全面的游戏笔记本电脑，拥有16:10的显示屏华硕ROG Zephyrus M16，测试装置由华硕提供华硕ROG Zephyrus M16是一款整体优化良好的游戏笔记本电脑，没有任何明显的问题领域。除了非常好的CPU性能和体面的电池寿命外，16:10格式的大型16英寸QHD+显示屏也知道如何以其强大的对比度和相当高的色彩空间覆盖率来取悦。
考虑到许多竞争对手完全没有任何SD卡读卡器的事实，我们可以原谅华硕只使用了一个microSD读卡器，特别是因为这里使用的设备相当快。 RTX 3070 TiRTX 3070 Ti只有120W的TGP，但这也意味着笔记本电脑不会变得太热，噪音水平也保持在限制范围内。另一方面，华硕可以优化风扇控制，因为不时地，即使在空闲运行时，风扇也会突然转速达到47分贝。
M16主要是作为一个全面的游戏包来展示自己。尽管它没有提供最大的性能，但该套装的温度和噪音水平都很适中。
那些需要更高的性能的人可以看一下 联想Legion 5 Pro或者你可以直接打开M16中同样响亮的Turbo模式，导致这里的性能也有明显的、可测量的提高。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
价格和可用性亚马逊列出了2022年华硕ROG Zephyrus M16的各种配置，起价2249美元。
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
- 02/14/2023 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze
Chassis85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard79%
Pointing Device86%
Connectivity67 / 80 → 84%
Weight63 / 10-66 → 94%
Battery74 / 95 → 77%
Display91%
Games Performance99%
Application Performance96%
Temperature81 / 95 → 85%
Noise66 / 90 → 73%
Audio89%
Camera32 / 85 → 38%
Average78%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z (ROG Zephyrus M16 Series)
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 548 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 617328 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!
水上芭蕾又称为什么（水上芭蕾什么意思）8款AI抠图神器推荐，让修图变得轻松又高效